What UK security leaders are missing about risk ownership, visibility, and AI
As we move deeper into 2026, many organisations have shifted from planning their security posture to actually delivering against it.
Budgets have been set. Programmes approved. Tools deployed.
And yet, as execution begins, a familiar set of issues is surfacing across cloud and SaaS environments, not because teams aren’t investing, but because clarity hasn’t kept pace with complexity.
This isn’t about a lack of effort. It’s about what becomes visible once intent turns into action.
The same risks, under more pressure
Across client environments, several patterns continue to appear:
Cloud and SaaS usage expanding faster than governance
Identity permissions drifting over time, particularly in Microsoft 365
External exposure increasing quietly through misconfiguration
Security teams well tooled, but overwhelmed by volume
Risk acceptance happening implicitly, without clear ownership
None of these are new problems. What’s changed is the pressure they’re now under.
As environments scale, small gaps stop being theoretical. They become operational decisions with real consequences.
Visibility is not the same as clarity
One of the biggest challenges we see is the assumption that seeing everything equates to being in control.
Many organisations now have excellent visibility:
Dashboards
Alerts
Reports
Scores
But visibility alone doesn’t answer the questions that actually reduce risk, such as:
Which changes materially affect our risk posture right now?
Who owns that risk; technically and commercially?
What risk are we consciously accepting, and why?
Without those answers, security becomes reactive. Teams are busy, but not always effective.
Ownership is still the missing link
Risk is rarely unmanaged because no one cares.
More often, it’s unmanaged because ownership is unclear.
When responsibility is diffused; spread across IT, security, vendors, and platforms, decisions default to inaction. Risk is “accepted” by default rather than by design.
Explicit ownership doesn’t slow teams down. It removes ambiguity and allows progress to happen with intent.
A moment to reset before momentum builds
Early in the year is a rare window to pause before delivery accelerates.
For many organisations, this is the right time to:
Sense-check cloud and SaaS exposure
Re-examine identity posture and permissions drift
Clarify where governance exists in practice, not just on paper
Decide which risks are genuinely acceptable, and which are not
Doing this early creates momentum later, without the noise, panic, or fatigue that often appears mid-year.
The Peritus lens
At Peritus Cloud Security, we work alongside internal IT and security teams to bring clarity to complex environments.
Not by adding more tools, but by helping teams:
Understand what truly matters
Assign clear ownership
Make conscious, defensible risk decisions
Security works best when it supports delivery, not when it competes with it.
Want more insights like this?
We share practical perspectives on cloud risk, governance, and security decision-making each month.
→ Talk to us about your current posture